4.8 Article

Wγ Production and Limits on Anomalous WWγ Couplings in p(p)over-bar Collisions at √s=1.96 TeV

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 107, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.241803

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE (USA)
  2. NSF (USA)
  3. CEA (France)
  4. CNRS/IN2P3 (France)
  5. FASI (Russia)
  6. Rosatom (Russia)
  7. RFBR (Russia)
  8. CNPq (Brazil)
  9. FAPERJ (Brazil)
  10. FAPESP (Brazil)
  11. FUNDUNESP (Brazil)
  12. DAE (India)
  13. DST (India)
  14. Colciencias (Colombia)
  15. CONACyT (Mexico)
  16. KRF (Korea)
  17. KOSEF (Korea)
  18. CONICET (Argentina)
  19. UBACyT (Argentina)
  20. FOM (The Netherlands)
  21. STFC (United Kingdom)
  22. Royal Society (United Kingdom)
  23. MSMT (Czech Republic)
  24. GACR (Czech Republic)
  25. CRC (Canada)
  26. NSERC (Canada)
  27. BMBF (Germany)
  28. DFG (Germany)
  29. SFI (Ireland)
  30. Swedish Research Council (Sweden)
  31. CAS (China)
  32. CNSF (China)
  33. STFC [PP/E000487/1, ST/F00754X/1, ST/F007418/1, ST/I505756/1, ST/H00095X/2, ST/J501074/1, ST/H00095X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  34. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  35. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H00095X/2, PP/E000487/1, ST/J501074/1, ST/H00095X/1, ST/F007418/1, ST/I505756/1, ST/F00754X/1, PP/D004284/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We measure the cross section and the difference in rapidities between photons and charged leptons for inclusive W(-> l nu) + gamma production in e gamma and mu gamma final states. Using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 4.2 fb(-1) collected with the D0 detector at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider, the measured cross section times branching fraction for the process p (p) over bar -> W gamma + X -> l nu gamma + X and the distribution of the charge-signed photon-lepton rapidity difference are found to be in agreement with the standard model. These results provide the most stringent limits on anomalous WW gamma couplings for data from hadron colliders: -0.4 < Delta kappa(gamma) < 0.4 and -0.08 < lambda(gamma) < 0.07 at the 95% C.L.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据