4.8 Article

Measurement of the Λb0 Lifetime in Λb0 → Λc+π- Decays in p(p)over-bar Collisions at √s=1.96 TeV

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 104, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.102002

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy and National Science Foundation
  2. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. National Science Council of the Republic of China
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation
  7. A.P. Sloan Foundation
  8. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung, Germany
  9. National Research Foundation of Korea
  10. Science and Technology Facilities Council and the Royal Society, UK
  11. Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et Physique des Particules/CNRS
  12. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  13. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, and Programa Consolider-Ingenio 2010, Spain
  14. Slovak RD Agency
  15. Academy of Finland
  16. STFC [ST/H001026/2, ST/H001077/1, ST/H001069/1, ST/H001026/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  17. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E000444/1, ST/H001026/2, ST/H001026/1, ST/H001069/1, ST/H001077/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a measurement of the lifetime of the Lambda(0)(b) baryon in decays to the Lambda(+)(c)pi(-) final state in a sample corresponding to 1.1 fb(-1) collected in p (p) over bar collisions at root s = 1.96 TeV by the CDF II detector at the Tevatron collider. Using a sample of about 3000 fully reconstructed Lambda(0)(b) events we measure tau(Lambda(0)(b) ) = 1.401 +/- 0.046(stat) +/- 0.035(syst) ps (corresponding to c tau(Lambda(0)(b)) = 420.1 +/- 13.7(stat) +/- 10.6(syst) mu m, where c is the speed of light). The ratio of this result and the world average B-0 lifetime yields tau(Lambda(0)(b))/tau(B-0) = 0.918 +/- 0.038 (stat) and (syst), in good agreement with recent theoretical predictions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据