4.7 Article

Activity-induced clustering in model dumbbell swimmers: The role of hydrodynamic interactions

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.022303

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation for the Promotion of Industrial Science
  2. JSPS
  3. MEXT
  4. EPSRC [EP/J007404]
  5. Royal Society
  6. EPSRC [EP/J007404/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J007404/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26103507, 26400425] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a fluid-particle dynamics approach, we numerically study the effects of hydrodynamic interactions on the collective dynamics of active suspensions within a simple model for bacterial motility: each microorganism is modeled as a stroke-averaged dumbbell swimmer with prescribed dipolar force pairs. Using both simulations and qualitative arguments, we show that, when the separation between swimmers is comparable to their size, the swimmers' motions are strongly affected by activity-induced hydrodynamic forces. To further understand these effects, we investigate semidilute suspensions of swimmers in the presence of thermal fluctuations. A direct comparison between simulations with and without hydrodynamic interactions shows these to enhance the dynamic clustering at a relatively small volume fraction; with our chosen model the key ingredient for this clustering behavior is hydrodynamic trapping of one swimmer by another, induced by the active forces. Furthermore, the density dependence of the motility (of both the translational and rotational motions) exhibits distinctly different behaviors with and without hydrodynamic interactions; we argue that this is linked to the clustering tendency. Our study illustrates the fact that hydrodynamic interactions not only affect kinetic pathways in active suspensions, but also cause major changes in their steady state properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据