4.7 Article

Epidemic threshold and topological structure of susceptible-infectious-susceptible epidemics in adaptive networks

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 88, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.042802

关键词

-

资金

  1. European project CONGAS [FP7-ICT-2011-8-317672]
  2. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2013YJS031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interplay between disease dynamics on a network and the dynamics of the structure of that network characterizes many real-world systems of contacts. A continuous-time adaptive susceptible-infectious-susceptible (ASIS) model is introduced in order to investigate this interaction, where a susceptible node avoids infections by breaking its links to its infected neighbors while it enhances the connections with other susceptible nodes by creating links to them. When the initial topology of the network is a complete graph, an exact solution to the average metastable-state fraction of infected nodes is derived without resorting to any mean-field approximation. A linear scaling law of the epidemic threshold tau(c) as a function of the effective link-breaking rate omega is found. Furthermore, the bifurcation nature of the metastable fraction of infected nodes of the ASIS model is explained. The metastable-state topology shows high connectivity and low modularity in two regions of the tau,omega plane for any effective infection rate tau > tau(c) : (i) a strongly adaptive region with very high omega and (ii) a weakly adaptive region with very low omega. These two regions are separated from the other half-open elliptical-like regions of low connectivity and high modularity in a contour-line-like way. Our results indicate that the adaptation of the topology in response to disease dynamics suppresses the infection, while it promotes the network evolution towards a topology that exhibits assortative mixing, modularity, and a binomial-like degree distribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据