4.7 Article

Complex networks embedded in space: Dimension and scaling relations between mass, topological distance, and Euclidean distance

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 87, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.032802

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61104144]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many real networks are embedded in space, and often the distribution of the link lengths r follows a power law, p(r) similar to r(-delta). Indications that such systems can be characterized by the concept of dimension were found recently. Here, we present further support for this claim, based on extensive numerical simulations of model networks with a narrow degree distribution, embedded in lattices of dimensions d(e) = 1 and d(e) = 2. For networks with delta < d(e), d is infinity, while for delta > 2d(e), d has the value of the embedding dimension d(e). In the intermediate regime of interest d(e) <= delta < 2d(e), our numerical results suggest that d decreases continuously from d =infinity to de, with d - d(e) proportional to (2 -delta')/[delta'(delta'-1] and delta' = delta/d(e). We also analyze how the mass M and the Euclidean distance r increase with the topological distance l (minimum number of links between two sites in the network). Our results suggest that in the intermediate regime d(e) delta < 2d(e), M(l) and r(l) increase with l as a stretched exponential, M(l) similar to exp[Adl(delta'(2-delta'))] and r(l) similar to exp[Al delta'(2-delta')], such that M(l) similar to r(l)(d). For delta < d(e), M increases exponentially with l (as known for delta = 0), while r is constant and independent of l. For >= 2d(e), we find the expected power-law scaling, M(l) similar to l(dl) and r(l) similar to l(1/dmin), with d(l)d(min) = d. In d(e) = 1, we find the expected result, d(l) = d(min) = 1, while in d(e) = 2 we find surprisingly that although d = 2, d(l) > 2 and d(min) < 1, in contrast to regular lattices. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.032802

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据