4.7 Article

Interdependent networks with identical degrees of mutually dependent nodes

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 83, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.016112

关键词

-

资金

  1. DTRA
  2. ONR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study a problem of failure of two interdependent networks in the case of identical degrees of mutually dependent nodes. We assume that both networks (A and B) have the same number of nodes N connected by the bidirectional dependency links establishing a one-to-one correspondence between the nodes of the two networks in a such a way that the mutually dependent nodes have the same number of connectivity links; i.e., their degrees coincide. This implies that both networks have the same degree distribution P(k). We call such networks correspondently coupled networks (CCNs). We assume that the nodes in each network are randomly connected. We define the mutually connected clusters and the mutual giant component as in earlier works on randomly coupled interdependent networks and assume that only the nodes that belong to the mutual giant component remain functional. We assume that initially a 1 - p fraction of nodes are randomly removed because of an attack or failure and find analytically, for an arbitrary P(k), the fraction of nodes mu(p) that belong to the mutual giant component. We find that the system undergoes a percolation transition at a certain fraction p = p(c), which is always smaller than p(c) for randomly coupled networks with the same P(k). We also find that the system undergoes a first-order transition at p(c) > 0 if P(k) has a finite second moment. For the case of scale-free networks with 2 < lambda <= 3, the transition becomes a second-order transition. Moreover, if lambda < 3, we find p(c) = 0, as in percolation of a single network. For lambda = 3 we find an exact analytical expression for p(c) > 0. Finally, we find that the robustness of CCN increases with the broadness of their degree distribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据