Reply to Comment on 'Phase diagram of a solution undergoing inverse melting'

In their comment, Plazanet, Johnson, and Trommsdorff [Phys. Rev. E 79, 053501 (2009)] point out inconsistencies of our work [Angelini, Ruocco, and De Panfilis, Phys. Rev. E 78, 020502(R) (2008)] with previous measurements performed in solutions composed of alpha-cyclodextrin, water, and 4-methylpyridine. In particular, they state that the phase transition observed between two fluid phases is simply due to a loss of solubility of the solutions. In this reply, we underline that our work, on the contrary, represents an extension in concentration and temperature ranges with respect to previous studies and that, how explicitly discussed in the same work, the most intimate nature of the high temperature fluid phase has never been defined homogeneous as objected to in the comment.