4.7 Article

Reaction-diffusion master equation, diffusion-limited reactions, and singular potentials

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 80, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.066106

关键词

biochemistry; master equation; molecule-molecule reactions; noise; pseudopotential methods; reaction kinetics theory; reaction-diffusion systems; stochastic processes

资金

  1. Systems Biology Center New York (NIH) [P50GM071558]
  2. NSF [DMS-0920886]
  3. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0920886] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To model biochemical systems in which both noise in the chemical reaction process and spatial movement of molecules is important, both the reaction-diffusion master equation (RDME) and Smoluchowski diffusion-limited reaction (SDLR) partial differential equation (PDE) models have been used. In previous work we showed that the solution to the RDME may be interpreted as an asymptotic approximation in the reaction radius to the solution of the SDLR PDE [S. A. Isaacson, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 70, 77 (2009)]. The approximation was shown to be divergent in the limit that the lattice spacing in the RDME approached zero. In this work we expand upon these results for the special case of the two-molecule annihilation reaction, A+B -> empty set. We first introduce a third stochastic reaction-diffusion PDE model that incorporates a pseudopotential based bimolecular reaction mechanism. The solution to the pseudopotential model is then shown to be an asymptotic approximation to the solution of the SDLR PDE for small reaction radii. We next illustrate how the RDME may be obtained by a formal discretization of the pseudopotential model, motivating why the RDME is itself an asymptotic approximation of the SDLR PDE. Finally, we give a more detailed numerical analysis of the difference between solutions to the RDME and SDLR PDE models as a function of both the reaction-radius and the lattice spacing (in the RDME).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据