4.7 Article

Composite bosonic baryon dark matter on the lattice: SU(4) baryon spectrum and the effective Higgs interaction

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 89, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.094508

关键词

-

资金

  1. LDRD [13-ERD-023]
  2. U. S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0008669, DE-SC0009998, DE-SC0010025, DE-FG02-92ER-40704, DE-FG02-96ER40969, DE-FG02-00ER41132, DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  3. Argonne Leadership Computing Facility [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. National Science Foundation [NSF PHY11-00905, PHY09-18108, OCI-0749300]
  5. Office of Nuclear Physics in the US Department of Energy's Office of Science [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0010025, DE-SC0009998, DE-SC0008669] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Physics [1417402, 1100905] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the spectrum of baryons in SU(4) gauge theory with fundamental fermion constituents, which is of significant interest for composite dark matter model building. We first compare the spectra and properties of baryons in SU(3) and SU(4) gauge theories (in which they are fermionic and bosonic, respectively) and then compute the cross section for direct detection of dark matter via Higgs boson exchange for TeV-scale composite dark matter arising from a confining SU(4) gauge sector. Comparison with the latest LUX results leads to tight bounds on the fraction of the mass of the constituent fermion that may arise from electroweak symmetry breaking. Lattice calculations of the dark matter mass spectrum and the Higgs-dark-matter coupling are performed on quenched 16(3) x 32, 32(3) x 64, 48(3) x 96, and 64(3) x 128 lattices with three different lattice spacings, using Wilson fermions with moderate to large pseudoscalar meson masses. Our results lay a foundation for future analytic and numerical studies of composite baryonic dark matter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据