4.7 Article

Neutrinos help reconcile Planck measurements with both the early and local Universe

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 90, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.083503

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [AST-0807444, PHY-088855425]
  2. Raymond Fund
  3. Beverly Sackler Fund
  4. James Arthur Postdoctoral Fellowship
  5. KICP
  6. Research Computing Center at the University of Chicago
  7. NSF [PHY-0114422, PHY-0551142]
  8. Kavli Foundation
  9. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-90ER-40560]
  10. Division Of Physics
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1125897] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In light of the recent BICEP2 B-mode polarization detection, which implies a large inflationary tensor-to-scalar ratio r(0.05) = 0.2(-0.05)(+0.07), we re-examine the evidence for an extra sterile massive neutrino, originally invoked to account for the tension between the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature power spectrum and local measurements of the expansion rate H-0 and cosmological structure. With only the standard active neutrinos and power-law scalar spectra, this detection is in tension with the upper limit of r < 0.11 (95% confidence) from the lack of a corresponding low multipole excess in the temperature anisotropy from gravitational waves. An extra sterile species with the same energy density as is needed to reconcile the CMB data with H-0 measurements can also alleviate this new tension. By combining data from the Planck and ACT/SPT temperature spectra, WMAP9 polarization, H-0, baryon acoustic oscillation and local cluster abundance measurements with BICEP2 data, we find the joint evidence for a sterile massive neutrino increases to Delta N-eff = 0.98 +/- 0.26 for the effective number and m(s) = 0.52 +/- 0.13 eV for the effective mass, or 3.8 sigma and 4 sigma evidence, respectively. We caution the reader that these results correspond to a joint statistical evidence and, in addition, astrophysical systematic errors in the clusters and H-0 measurements, and small-scale CMB data could weaken our conclusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据