4.7 Article

Experimental constraints on the spin and parity of the Z(4430)+

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 88, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.074026

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. Tau-Lepton Physics Research Center of Nagoya University
  4. Australian Research Council and the Australian Department of Industry, Innovation, Science and Research
  5. Austrian Science Fund [22742-N16]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10575109, 10775142, 10875115]
  7. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [MSM0021620859]
  8. Carl Zeiss Foundation
  9. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  10. Department of Science and Technology of India
  11. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare of Italy
  12. BK21 and WCU programs of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
  13. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0021174, 2011-0029457, 2012-0008143, 2012R1A1A2008330]
  14. BRL [KRF-2011-0020333]
  15. GSDC of the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information
  16. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education
  17. National Science Center
  18. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
  19. Russian Federal Agency for Atomic Energy and Russian Foundation [12-02-00862-a]
  20. Slovenian Research Agency
  21. the Basque Foundation for Science (IKERBASQUE)
  22. Swiss National Science Foundation
  23. National Science Council and theMinistry of Education of Taiwan
  24. U.S. Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation
  25. MEXT
  26. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  27. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  28. Tau-Lepton Physics Research Center of Nagoya University
  29. Australian Research Council and the Australian Department of Industry, Innovation, Science and Research
  30. Austrian Science Fund [22742-N16]
  31. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10575109, 10775142, 10875115]
  32. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [MSM0021620859]
  33. Carl Zeiss Foundation
  34. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  35. Department of Science and Technology of India
  36. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare of Italy
  37. BK21 and WCU programs of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
  38. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0021174, 2011-0029457, 2012-0008143, 2012R1A1A2008330]
  39. BRL [KRF-2011-0020333]
  40. GSDC of the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information
  41. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education
  42. National Science Center
  43. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
  44. Russian Federal Agency for Atomic Energy and Russian Foundation [12-02-00862-a]
  45. Slovenian Research Agency
  46. the Basque Foundation for Science (IKERBASQUE)
  47. Swiss National Science Foundation
  48. National Science Council and theMinistry of Education of Taiwan
  49. U.S. Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation
  50. MEXT
  51. STFC [ST/K003410/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  52. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0021174, 2012R1A1A2008330] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  53. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K003410/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We perform a full amplitude analysis of B-0 -> psi'K+ pi(-) decays, with psi' -> mu + mu- or e+e -, to constrain the spin and parity of the Z(4430)-. The JP = 1(+) hypothesis is favored over the 0(-), 1(-), 2(-) and 2(+) hypotheses at the levels of 3: 4 sigma, 3: 7 sigma, 4: 7 sigma and 5.1 sigma , respectively. The analysis is based on a 711 fb(-1) data sample that contains 772 x 10(6) B (B) over bar pairs collected at the Upsilon(4S) resonance by the Belle detector at the asymmetric-energy e(+)e(-) collider KEKB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据