4.7 Article

The Observed squeezed limit of cosmological three-point functions

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 88, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.083502

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy Grant [DE-FG02-91ER-40671]
  2. NASA through Einstein Postdoctoral Fellowship [PF2-130100]
  3. NASA [NAS8-03060]
  4. National Science Foundation [PHY-0855425, AST-0907969, PHY-1213563]
  5. David & Lucile Packard foundation
  6. Division Of Physics
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1213563] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The squeezed limit of the three-point function of cosmological perturbations is a powerful discriminant of different models of the early Universe. We present a conceptually simple and complete framework to relate any primordial bispectrum in this limit to late time observables, such as the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature bispectrum and the scale-dependent halo bias. We employ a series of convenient coordinate transformations to capture the leading nonlinear effects of cosmological perturbation theory on these observables. This makes crucial use of Fermi normal coordinates and their conformal generalization, which we introduce here and discuss in detail. As an example, we apply our formalism to standard slow-roll single-field inflation. We show explicitly that Maldacena's results for the squeezed limits of the scalar bispectrum [proportional to (n(s) - 1) in comoving gauge] and the tensor-scalar-scalar bispectrum lead to no deviations from a Gaussian universe, except for projection effects. In particular, the primordial contributions to the squeezed CMB bispectrum and scale dependent halo bias vanish, and there are no primordial fossil'' correlations between long-wavelength tensor perturbations and small-scale perturbations. The contributions to observed correlations are then only due to projection effects such as gravitational lensing and redshift perturbations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据