4.7 Article

How massless neutrinos affect the cosmic microwave background damping tail

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 87, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.083008

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [0709498, ANT-0638937]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0709498] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We explore the physical origin and robustness of constraints on the energy density in relativistic species prior to and during recombination, often expressed as constraints on an effective number of neutrino species, N-eff. If the primordial helium abundance, Y-P, follows the prediction of the big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) theory, the constraint on N-eff from current cosmic microwave background anisotropy data is almost entirely due to the impact of the neutrinos on the expansion rate, and how those changes to the expansion rate alter the ratio of the photon diffusion scale to the sound horizon scale at recombination. We demonstrate that, as long as the primordial helium abundance is derived in a BBN-consistent manner, the constraint on N-eff degrades little after marginalizing over A(eISW), the phenomenological parameter characterizing the amplitude of the early Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect. We also provide a first determination of A(eISW). Varying the Y-P also changes the ratio of damping to sound horizon scales. We study the physical effects that prevent the resulting near degeneracy between N-eff and Y-P from being a complete one and find that the early ISW effect does play a role in breaking this degeneracy. Examining light-element abundance measurements, we see no significant evidence for the evolution of N-eff and the baryon-to-photon ratio from the epoch of BBN to decoupling. Finally, we consider measurements of the distance-redshift relation at low to intermediate redshifts and their implications for the value of N-eff. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.083008

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据