4.7 Article

CoGeNT: A search for low-mass dark matter using p-type point contact germanium detectors

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 88, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.012002

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [PHY-0653605, PHY-1003940]
  2. Kavli Foundation
  3. PNNL Ultra-Sensitive Nuclear Measurement Initiative LDRD program [PNNL-SA-90298]
  4. DOE/NNSA Stewardship Science Graduate Fellowship program [DE-FC52-08NA28752]
  5. Intelligence Community (IC) Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Physics [1125897, 1003940] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CoGeNT employs p-type point-contact (PPC) germanium detectors to search for weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs). By virtue of its low-energy threshold and ability to reject surface backgrounds, this type of device allows an emphasis on low-mass dark matter candidates (m(chi) similar to 10 GeV/c(2)). We report on the characteristics of the PPC detector presently taking data at the Soudan Underground Laboratory, elaborating on aspects of shielding, data acquisition, instrumental stability, data analysis, and background estimation. A detailed background model is used to investigate the low-energy excess of events previously reported and to assess the possibility of temporal modulations in the low-energy event rate. Extensive simulations of all presently known backgrounds do not provide a viable background explanation for the excess of low-energy events in the CoGeNT data or the previously observed temporal variation in the event rate. Also reported for the first time is a determination of the surface (slow pulse rise time) event contamination in the data as a function of energy. We conclude that the CoGeNT detector technology is well suited to search for the annual modulation signature expected from dark matter particle interactions in the region of WIMP mass and coupling favored by the DAMA/LIBRA results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据