4.7 Article

Charged lepton flavor violation in supersymmetric low-scale seesaw models

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 87, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.053014

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lancaster-Manchester-Sheffield Consortium for Fundamental Physics under STFC [ST/J000418/1]
  2. IPPP, Durham University
  3. Ministry of Science, Sports, and Technology [119-0982930-1016]
  4. STFC [ST/J000418/1, ST/G00045X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J000418/1, ST/G00045X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study charged lepton flavor violation in low-scale seesaw models of minimal supergravity, which realize large neutrino Yukawa couplings thanks to approximate lepton-number symmetries. There are two dominant sources of lepton flavor violation in such models. The first source originates from the usual soft supersymmetry-breaking sector, whilst the second one is entirely supersymmetric and comes from the supersymmetric neutrino Yukawa sector. Within the framework of minimal supergravity, we consider both sources of lepton flavor violation, soft and supersymmetric, and calculate a number of possible lepton-flavor-violating transitions, such as the photonic decays of muons and taus, mu -> e gamma, tau -> e gamma and tau -> mu gamma, their neutrinoless three-body decays, mu -> eee, tau -> eee, tau -> mu mu mu, tau -> ee mu and tau -> e mu mu, and the coherent mu -> e conversion in nuclei. After taking into account the exclusion bounds placed by present experiments of lepton flavor violation, we derive combined theoretical limits on the universal heavy Majorana mass scale m(N) and the light-to-heavy neutrino mixings. Supersymmetric low-scale seesaw models offer distinct correlated predictions for lepton-flavor-violating signatures, which might be discovered in current and projected experiments, such as MEG, COMET/PRISM, Mu2e, super-BELLE and LHCb. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.053014

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据