4.7 Article

Measurement of electrons from semileptonic heavy-flavor hadron decays in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 86, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.112007

关键词

-

资金

  1. Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation from Lisbon
  2. Swiss Fonds Kidagan, Armenia
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  4. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP)
  5. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  7. Chinese Ministry of Education (CMOE)
  8. Ministry of Science and Technology of China (MSTC)
  9. Ministry of Education and Youth of the Czech Republic
  10. Danish Natural Science Research Council
  11. Carlsberg Foundation
  12. Danish National Research Foundation
  13. European Research Council under the European Community
  14. Helsinki Institute of Physics
  15. Academy of Finland
  16. French CNRS-IN2P3
  17. Region Pays de Loire
  18. Region Alsace
  19. Region Auvergne
  20. CEA, France
  21. German BMBF
  22. Helmholtz Association
  23. General Secretariat for Research and Technology, Ministry of Development, Greece
  24. Hungarian OTKA
  25. National Office for Research and Technology (NKTH)
  26. Department of Atomic Energy and Department of Science and Technology of the Government of India
  27. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) of Italy
  28. MEXT, Japan
  29. Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna
  30. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  31. CONACYT
  32. DGAPA, Mexico
  33. ALFA-EC
  34. HELEN Program (High-Energy Physics Latin-American-European Network)
  35. Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM)
  36. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), Netherlands
  37. Research Council of Norway (NFR)
  38. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education
  39. National Authority for Scientific Research-NASR (Autoritatea Nationala pentru Cercetare Stiintifica-ANCS)
  40. FederalAgency of Science of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation
  41. International Science and Technology Center
  42. Russian Academy of Sciences
  43. Russian Federal Agency of Atomic Energy
  44. Russian Federal Agency for Science and Innovations
  45. CERN-INTAS
  46. Ministry of Education of Slovakia
  47. Department of Science and Technology, South Africa
  48. CIEMAT, EELA
  49. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia of Spain
  50. Xunta de Galicia (Conselleria de Educacion)
  51. CEADEN
  52. Cubaenergia, Cuba
  53. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)
  54. Swedish Research Council (VR)
  55. Knut & Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW)
  56. Ukraine Ministry of Education and Science
  57. United Kingdom Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  58. United States Department of Energy
  59. United States National Science Foundation
  60. State of Texas
  61. State of Ohio
  62. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  63. Division Of Physics [0969966, 1305280] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  64. Division Of Physics
  65. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0968903] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  66. STFC [ST/J000140/1, ST/G008833/1, ST/I003398/1, ST/J000108/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  67. Science and Technology Facilities Council [GRIDPP, ST/J000140/1, ST/I003398/1, ST/J000108/1, ST/G008833/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  68. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23340074, 20224014, 23244055] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The differential production cross section of electrons from semileptonic heavy-flavor hadron decays has been measured at midrapidity (\y\ < 0.5) in proton-proton collisions at root s = 7 TeV with ALICE at the LHC. Electrons were measured in the transverse momentum range 0.5 < p(t) < 8 GeV/c. Predictions from a fixed-order perturbative QCD calculation with next-to-leading-log resummation agree with the data within the theoretical and experimental uncertainties. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.112007

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据