4.7 Article

Study of substructure of high transverse momentum jets produced in proton-antiproton collisions at √s=1.96 TeV

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 85, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.091101

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  6. National Science Council of the Republic of China
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation
  8. A. P. Sloan Foundation
  9. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung, Germany
  10. Korean World Class University, National Research Foundation of Korea
  11. Science and Technology Facilities Council
  12. Royal Society, UK
  13. Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et Physique des Particules/CNRS
  14. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  15. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain
  16. Slovak RD Agency
  17. Academy of Finland
  18. Australian Research Council (ARC)
  19. Shrum Foundation
  20. Weizmann Institute of Science
  21. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  22. STFC [ST/H001026/2, PP/E003699/1, ST/H001069/2, PP/E003699/2, ST/H001026/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  23. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E003699/1, ST/K001418/1, PP/E003699/2, ST/M001474/1, ST/H001026/2, ST/H001069/2, ST/H001026/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study of the substructure of jets with transverse momentum greater than 400 GeV/c produced in proton-antiproton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 1.96 TeV at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider and recorded by the CDF II detector is presented. The distributions of the jet mass, angularity, and planar flow are measured for the first time in a sample with an integrated luminosity of 5.95 fb(-1). The observed substructure for high mass jets is consistent with predictions from perturbative quantum chromodynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据