4.7 Article

Amplitude analysis of B0 → K+ π- π0 and evidence of direct CP violation in B → K * π decays

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 83, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.112010

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
  4. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique and Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et de Physique des Particules (France)
  5. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Germany)
  6. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (Italy)
  7. Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (The Netherlands)
  8. Research Council of Norway
  9. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
  10. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (Spain)
  11. Science and Technology Facilities Council (United Kingdom)
  12. European Union
  13. A.P. Sloan Foundation (USA)
  14. Binational Science Foundation (USA-Israel)
  15. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  16. Division Of Physics [0969487] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyze the decay B-0 -> K+ pi(-) pi(0) with a sample of 4.54 x 10(8) B (B) over bar events collected by the BABAR detector at the PEP-II asymmetric-energy B factory at SLAC, and extract the complex amplitudes of seven interfering resonances over the Dalitz plot. These results are combined with amplitudes measured in B-0 -> K-S(0)pi(+)pi(-) decays to construct isospin amplitudes from B-0 -> K* pi and B-0 -> rho K decays. We measure the phase of the isospin amplitude Phi(3/2), useful in constraining the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa unitarity triangle angle gamma and evaluate a CP rate asymmetry sum rule sensitive to the presence of new physics operators. We measure direct CP violation in B-0 -> K*(+) pi(-) decays at the level of 3 sigma when measurements from both B-0 -> K+ pi(-) pi(0) and B-0 -> K-S(0) pi(+) pi(-) decays are combined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据