4.7 Article

Normal ground state of dense relativistic matter in a magnetic field

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 83, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.085003

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss NSF [IZ73Z0-128026]
  2. European FP7 program [SIMTECH 246937]
  3. Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research [F28.2/083]
  4. Ukrainian State Foundation for Fundamental Research (DFFD)
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  6. Arizona State University
  7. U.S. National Science Foundation [PHY-0969844]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The properties of the ground state of relativistic matter in a magnetic field are examined within the framework of a Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model. The main emphasis of this study is the normal ground state, which is realized at sufficiently high temperatures and/or sufficiently large chemical potentials. In contrast to the vacuum state, which is characterized by the magnetic catalysis of chiral symmetry breaking, the normal state is accompanied by the dynamical generation of the chiral shift parameter Delta. In the chiral limit, the value of Delta determines a relative shift of the longitudinal momenta (along the direction of the magnetic field) in the dispersion relations of opposite chirality fermions. We argue that the chirality remains a good approximate quantum number even for massive fermions in the vicinity of the Fermi surface and, therefore, the chiral shift is expected to play an important role in many types of cold dense relativistic matter, relevant for applications in compact stars. The qualitative implications of the revealed structure of the normal ground state on the physics of protoneutron stars are discussed. A noticeable feature of the Delta parameter is that it is insensitive to temperature when T << mu(0), where mu(0) is the chemical potential, and increases with temperature for T > mu(0). The latter implies that the chiral shift parameter is also generated in the regime relevant for heavy ion collisions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据