4.7 Article

Tuning Fermilab heavy quarks in 2+1 flavor lattice QCD with application to hyperfine splittings

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 83, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.034503

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FC02-06ER41446, DE-FG02-91ER40661, DE-FG02-91ER40677, DE-FG02-91ER40628, DE-FG02-04ER-41298, DE-AC02-98CH10886, DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  3. National Science Foundation [PHY-0555243, NPHY-0757333, PHY-0703296, PHY-0757035, PHY-0704171, PHY-0555235]
  4. Universities Research Associates
  5. American Physical Society
  6. BNL
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G00059X/1, ST/J000442/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. STFC [ST/J000442/1, ST/G00059X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  10. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC) [0910735] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  12. Division Of Physics [757035] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. Division Of Physics
  14. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [757333] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the nonperturbative tuning of parameters-kappa(c), kappa(b), and kappa(crit)-that are related to the bare heavy-quark mass in the Fermilab action. This requires the computation of the masses of D-s(*) B-s(*) and mesons comprised of a Fermilab heavy quark and a staggered light quark. Additionally, we report the hyperfine splittings for D-s(*) and B-s(*) mesons as a cross-check of our simulation and analysis methods. We find a splitting of 145 +/- 15 MeV for the D-s system and 40 +/- 9 MeV for the Bs system. These are in good agreement with the Particle Data Group average values of 143: 9 +/- 0: 4 MeV and 46: 1 +/- 1.5 MeV, respectively. The calculations are carried out with the MILC 2 + 1 flavor gauge configurations at three lattice spacings a approximate to 0: 15, 0.12, and 0.09 fm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据