4.7 Article

Combined limits on WIMPs from the CDMS and EDELWEISS experiments

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 84, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.011102

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [AST-9978911, PHY-0542066, PHY-0503729, PHY-0503629, PHY-0503641, PHY-0504224, PHY-0705052, PHY-0801708, PHY-0801712, PHY-0802575, PHY-0855525]
  2. NSERC Canada [SAPPJ 386399]
  3. Department of Energy [DE-AC03-76SF00098, DE-FG02-91ER40688, DE-FG02-92ER40701, DE-FG03-90ER40569, DE-FG03-91ER40618]
  4. Swiss National Foundation (SNF) [20-118119]
  5. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-06-BLAN-0376-01]
  6. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council, UK
  8. STFC [ST/H001026/2, ST/J000671/1, ST/H001026/1, ST/J000663/1, ST/I003371/1, ST/I00338X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I003371/1, ST/I00338X/1, ST/H001026/2, ST/H001026/1, ST/J000671/1, ST/J000663/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-06-BLAN-0376] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The CDMS and EDELWEISS collaborations have combined the results of their direct searches for dark matter using cryogenic germanium detectors. The total data set represents 614 kg . days equivalent exposure. A straightforward method of combination was chosen for its simplicity before data were exchanged between experiments. The results are interpreted in terms of limits on spin-independent weakly interacting, massive particle (WIMP)-nucleon cross section. For a WIMP mass of 90 GeV/c(2), where this analysis is most sensitive, a cross section of 3: 3 x 10(-44) cm(2) is excluded at 90% C.L. At higher WIMP masses, the combination improves the individual limits, by a factor 1.6 above 700 GeV/c(2). Alternative methods of combining the data provide stronger constraints for some ranges of WIMP masses and weaker constraints for others.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据