4.7 Article

Nonlocal Polyakov-Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model beyond mean field and the QCD phase transition

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 83, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.116004

关键词

-

资金

  1. Heisenberg-Landau program
  2. EMMI
  3. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [09-02-00749, 08-02-01003, 11-02-01538]
  4. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [NN 202 231837]
  5. European Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A nonlocal chiral quark model is consistently extended beyond mean field using a strict 1/N-c expansion scheme. The parameters of the nonlocal model are refitted so that the physical values of the pion mass and the weak pion decay constant are obtained. The size of the 1/N-c correction to the quark condensate is carefully studied and compared with the usual local Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model. It is found that even the sign of the corrections can be different. This can be attributed to the mesonic cutoff of the local model. The model is also applied to finite temperature. We find that the 1/N-c corrections dominate the melting of the chiral condensate at low temperatures, T less than or similar to 100 MeV, in agreement with chiral perturbation theory. On the other hand, the relative importance of the 1/N-c corrections in the crossover regime depends on the parameter T-0 of the Polyakov-loop potential. For T-0 = 270 MeV, corresponding to a fit of lattice data for pure gluodynamics, the correction terms are large and lead to a lowering of the chiral phase-transition temperature in comparison with the mean-field result. Near the phase transition the 1/N-c expansion breaks down and a nonperturbative scheme is needed to include mesonic correlations in that regime. Lowering T-0 leads to a more rapid crossover even at the mean-field level and the unstable region for the 1/N-c corrections shrinks. For T-0 less than or similar to 220 MeV the temperatures of deconfinement and chiral restoration are practically synchronized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据