4.7 Article

Black hole-neutron star mergers: Effects of the orientation of the black hole spin

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 83, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.024005

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sherman Fairchild Foundation
  2. NSF [PHY-0652952, PHY-0652929, TG-PHY990007N]
  3. NASA [NNX09AF96G]
  4. Canada Foundation for Innovation under the auspices of Compute Canada
  5. Government of Ontario
  6. Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence
  7. University of Toronto
  8. Division Of Physics
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1005426] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spin of black holes in black hole-neutron star binaries can have a strong influence on the merger dynamics and the post-merger state; a wide variety of spin magnitudes and orientations are expected to occur in nature. In this paper, we report the first simulations in full general relativity of black hole-neutron star mergers with misaligned black hole spin. We vary the spin magnitude from a(BH)/M-BH = 0 to a(BH)/M-BH = 0.9 for aligned cases, and we vary the misalignment angle from 0 to 80 degrees for a(BH)/M-BH = 0.5. We restrict our study to 3:1 mass-ratio systems and use a simple Gamma-law equation of state. We find that the misalignment angle has a strong effect on the mass of the post-merger accretion disk, but only for angles greater than approximate to 40 degrees. Although the disk mass varies significantly with spin magnitude and misalignment angle, we find that all disks have very similar lifetimes approximate to 100 ms. Their thermal and rotational profiles are also very similar. For a misaligned merger, the disk is tilted with respect to the final black hole's spin axis. This will cause the disk to precess, but on a time scale longer than the accretion time. In all cases, we find promising setups for gamma-ray burst production: the disks are hot, thick, and hyperaccreting, and a baryon-clear region exists above the black hole.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据