4.7 Article

Strong gravitational lensing in a squashed Kaluza-Klein Godel black hole

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 83, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.124019

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10875041, 10875040, 10935013]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT) [IRT0964]
  3. construct program of key disciplines in Hunan Province
  4. 973 Program [2010CB833004]
  5. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [08JJ3010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the strong gravitational lensing in a squashed Kaluza-Klein black hole immersed in the Godel universe with global rotation. Our results show that the strong gravitational lensing in the squashed Kaluza-Klein Godel black hole spacetime has some distinct behaviors from that in the Kerr case. In the squashed Kaluza-Klein Godel black hole spacetime, the photon sphere radius, the minimum impact parameter, the coefficient (a) over bar,(b) over bar, and the deflection angle alpha(theta) in the phi direction are independent of whether the photon goes with or against the global rotation of the Godel Universe. While in the Kerr black hole, the values of these quantities for the prograde photons are different from those for the retrograde photons. Moreover, the coefficient of (b) over bar increases with j in the squashed Kaluza-Klein Godel black hole, but decreases with a in the Kerr case. We also probe the influence of the squashed effect on the strong gravitational lensing in this black hole and find that in the extremely squashed case rho(0) = 0, the coefficient (a) over bar a is a constant 1 and is independent of the global rotation of the Godel Universe. Furthermore, we assume that the gravitational field of the supermassive central object of the Galaxy can be described by this metric and estimate the numerical values of the coefficients and the main observables in the strong gravitational lensing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据