4.7 Article

Mode coupling of Schwarzschild perturbations: Ringdown frequencies

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 82, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.104028

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [0801213, 0925345, 0941417, 0903973, 0955825]
  2. Spanish MICINN [FIS2008-06078-C03-03]
  3. French ANR [BLAN07-1_201699]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB/TR 7]
  5. Division Of Physics
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0801213, 955825] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Physics
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0925345, 0903973] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  10. Directorate For Engineering [0941417] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Within linearized perturbation theory, black holes decay to their final stationary state through the well-known spectrum of quasinormal modes. Here we numerically study whether nonlinearities change this picture. For that purpose we study the ringdown frequencies of gauge-invariant second-order gravitational perturbations induced by self-coupling of linearized perturbations of Schwarzschild black holes. We do so through high-accuracy simulations in the time domain of first and second-order Regge-Wheeler-Zerilli type equations, for a variety of initial data sets. We consider first-order even-parity (l =2, m +/- 2) perturbations and odd-parity (l = 2, m = 0) ones, and all the multipoles that they generate through self-coupling. For all of them and all the initial data sets considered we find that-in contrast to previous predictions in the literature-the numerical decay frequencies of second-order perturbations are the same ones of linearized theory, and we explain the observed behavior. This would indicate, in particular, that when modeling or searching for ringdown gravitational waves, appropriately including the standard quasinormal modes already takes into account nonlinear effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据