4.7 Article

Measurement of the WW plus WZ production cross section using a matrix element technique in lepton plus jets events

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 82, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.112001

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  6. Humboldt Foundation
  7. National Science Council of the Republic of China
  8. Swiss National Science Foundation
  9. A.P. Sloan Foundation
  10. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung, Germany
  11. Korean Science and Engineering Foundation
  12. Korean Research Foundation
  13. Science and Technology Facilities Council
  14. Royal Society, UK
  15. Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et Physique des Particules/CNRS
  16. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  17. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  18. Programa Consolider-Ingenio 2010, Spain
  19. Slovak RD Agency
  20. Academy of Finland
  21. STFC [ST/H001069/1, ST/H001077/1, ST/H001026/2, ST/H001026/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  22. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H001026/1, ST/H001069/1, ST/H001077/1, PP/E000444/1, ST/H001026/2] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a measurement of the WW + WZ production cross section observed in a final state consisting of an identified electron or muon, two jets, and missing transverse energy. The measurement is carried out in a data sample corresponding to up to 4.6 fb(-1) of integrated luminosity at root s = 1.96 TeV collected by the CDF II detector. Matrix element calculations are used to separate the diboson signal from the large backgrounds. The WW + WZ cross section is measured to be 17.4 +/- 3.3 pb in agreement with standard model predictions. A fit to the dijet invariant mass spectrum yields a compatible cross section measurement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据