4.7 Article

Measurements of the top-quark mass using charged particle tracking

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 81, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.032002

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  6. National Science Council of the Republic of China
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation
  8. A.P. Sloan Foundation
  9. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung, Germany
  10. Korean Science and Engineering Foundation
  11. Korean Research Foundation
  12. Science and Technology Facilities Council
  13. Royal Society, UK
  14. Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et Physique des Particules/CNRS
  15. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  16. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, and Programa Consolider-Ingenio 2010, Spain
  17. Slovak R and D Agency
  18. Academy of Finland
  19. STFC [ST/H001026/1, ST/H001069/1, ST/H001077/1, ST/H001026/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  20. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E000444/1, ST/H001026/2, ST/H001026/1, ST/H001069/1, ST/H001077/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present three measurements of the top-quark mass in the lepton plus jets channel with approximately 1.9 fb(-1) of integrated luminosity collected with the CDF II detector using quantities with minimal dependence on the jet energy scale. One measurement exploits the transverse decay length of b-tagged jets to determine a top-quark mass of 166.9(-8.5)(+9.5)(stat) +/- 2.9(syst) GeV/c(2), and another the transverse momentum of electrons and muons from W-boson decays to determine a top-quark mass of 173.5(-8.9)(+8.8)(stat) +/- 3.8(syst) GeV/c(2). These quantities are combined in a third, simultaneous mass measurement to determine a top-quark mass of 170.7 +/- 6.3(stat) +/- 2.6(syst) GeV/c(2) .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据