4.7 Article

General relativistic simulations of black-hole-neutron-star mergers: Effects of black-hole spin

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 79, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.044024

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [PHY02-05155, PHY06-50377, PHY07-56514]
  2. NASA [NNG04GK54G, NNX07AG96G]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Physics [756514] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Black-hole-neutron-star (BHNS) binary mergers are candidate engines for generating both short-hard gamma-ray bursts and detectable gravitational waves. Using our most recent conformal thin-sandwich BHNS initial data and our fully general relativistic hydrodynamics code, which is now adaptive mesh refinement capable, we are able to efficiently and accurately simulate these binaries from large separations through inspiral, merger, and ringdown. We evolve the metric using the Baumgarte-Shapiro-Shibata-Nakamura formulation with the standard moving puncture gauge conditions, and handle the hydrodynamics with a high-resolution shock-capturing scheme. We explore the effects of BH spin (aligned and antialigned with the orbital angular momentum) by evolving three sets of initial data with BH:NS mass ratio q=3: the data sets are nearly identical, except the BH spin is varied between a/M-BH=-0.5 (antialigned), 0.0, and 0.75. The number of orbits before merger increases with a/M-BH, as expected. We also study the nonspinning BH case in more detail, varying q between 1, 3, and 5. We calculate gravitational waveforms for the cases we simulate and compare them to binary black-hole waveforms. Only a small disk (< 0.01M) forms for the antialigned spin case (a/M-BH=-0.5) and for the most extreme-mass-ratio case (q=5). By contrast, a massive (M-disk approximate to 0.2M) hot disk forms in the rapidly spinning (a/M-BH=0.75) aligned BH case. Such a disk could drive a short-hard gamma-ray burst, possibly by, e.g., producing a copious flux of neutrino-antineutrino pairs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据