4.7 Article

Measurement of the t(t)over-bar production cross section in 2 fb-1 of p(p)over-bar collisions at √s = 1.96 TeV using lepton plus jets events with soft muon b tagging

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 79, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.052007

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation
  2. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. National Science Council of the Republic of China
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation
  7. A. P. Sloan Foundation
  8. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung, Germany
  9. Korean Science and Engineering Foundation
  10. Korean Research Foundation
  11. Science and Technology Facilities Council
  12. Royal Society, UK
  13. Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et Physique des Particules/CNRS
  14. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  15. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  16. Programa Consolider-Ingenio 2010, Spain
  17. Slovak RD Agency
  18. Academy of Finland
  19. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PPA/A/S/2003/00461/2, PP/E000452/1, ST/H001069/1, PP/E000444/1, ST/H001077/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  20. STFC [PP/E000452/1, ST/H001069/1, ST/H001077/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a measurement of the t (t) over bar production cross section in p (p) over bar collisions at root s = 1.96 TeV using events containing a high transverse momentum electron or muon, three or more jets, and missing transverse energy. Events consistent with t (t) over bar decay are found by identifying jets containing candidate heavy-flavor semileptonic decays to muons. The measurement uses a CDF run II data sample corresponding to 2 fb(-1) of integrated luminosity. Based on 248 candidate events with three or more jets and an expected background of 79.5 +/- 5.3 events, we measure a production cross section of 9.1 +/- 1.6 pb.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据