4.7 Article

Search for the Higgs boson produced in association with Z → l+l- using the matrix element method at CDF II

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 80, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.071101

关键词

-

资金

  1. U. S. Department of Energy and National Science Foundation
  2. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. National Science Council of the Republic of China
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation
  7. A. P. Sloan Foundation
  8. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung, Germany
  9. Science and Technology Facilities Council
  10. Royal Society, UK
  11. Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et Physique des Particules/CNRS
  12. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  13. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, and Programa Consolider-Ingenio 2010, Spain
  14. Slovak RD Agency
  15. Academy of Finland
  16. STFC [PP/E000452/1, ST/H001069/1, ST/H001077/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  17. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PPA/A/S/2003/00461/2, PP/E000452/1, ST/H001069/1, PP/E000444/1, ST/H001077/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a search for associated production of the standard model Higgs boson and a Z boson where the Z boson decays to two leptons and the Higgs decays to a pair of b quarks in p (p) over bar collisions at the Fermilab Tevatron. We use event probabilities based on standard model matrix elements to construct a likelihood function of the Higgs content of the data sample. In a CDF data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2: 7 fb(-1) we see no evidence of a Higgs boson with a mass between 100 GeV=c(2) and 150 GeV/c(2). We set 95% confidence level upper limits on the cross section for ZH production as a function of the Higgs boson mass m(H); the limit is 8.2 times the standard model prediction at m(H) 115 GeV/c(2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据