4.5 Article

Electromagnetic moments of odd-A 193-203,211Po isotopes

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 89, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.034323

关键词

-

资金

  1. FWO-Vlaanderen (Belgium)
  2. BOF-K.U. Leuven [GOA/2004/03]
  3. IUAP-Belgian State Belgian Science Policy (BriX network) [P7/12]
  4. European Commission through I3-EURONS [RII3-CT-2004-506065]
  5. U.K. Science and Technology Facilities Council
  6. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-0105-10]
  7. STFC [ST/L005689/1, ST/G008671/1, EP/E004385/1, ST/H008691/2, EP/C015266/1, ST/L005670/1, ST/H008691/1, ST/J000094/1, ST/J000124/1, ST/G006415/1, EP/D002257/1, ST/J000183/1, ST/J004189/1, ST/J000159/1, ST/L005727/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [EP/E004385/1, ST/J004189/1, ST/J000124/1, EP/D002257/1, ST/H008691/2, ST/L005689/1, ST/J000159/1, ST/G006415/1, ST/L005727/1, ST/H008691/1, ST/G008671/1, EP/C015266/1, ST/J000094/1, ST/J000183/1, ST/L005670/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperfine splitting parameters have been measured for the neutron-deficient odd-mass polonium isotopes and isomers Po-193-203(g,m), Po-209,Po-211. The measurement was performed at the ISOLDE (CERN) online mass separator using the in-source resonance ionization spectroscopy technique. The magnetic dipole moments mu and spectroscopic electric quadrupole moments Q(S) have been deduced. Their implication for the understanding of nuclear structure in the vicinity of the closed proton shell at Z = 82 and the neutron mid-shell at N = 104 is discussed. For the most neutron-deficient nuclei (A = 193,195,197), a deviation of mu and QS from the nearly constant values for heavier polonium nuclei was observed. Particle-plus-rotor calculations with static oblate deformation describe the electromagnetic moments for these nuclei well, provided a gradual increase of a mean deformation when going to lighter masses is assumed for the polonium nuclei with A < 198.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据