4.5 Article

Role of the coupling between neck and radial degrees of freedom in evolution from dinucleus to mononucleus

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 83, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.044613

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10735100, 10875013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The coupled Langevin equations in two-dimensional collective space are used to study the dynamics of nuclear neck growth. Special attention is paid to the effects of coupling between neck and radial degrees of freedom on the evolution from dinucleus to mononuleus. The dynamic model is applied for the study of neck evolution of the mass asymmetric system Ti-50 + Cf-249. In order to estimate the effects of the coupling, we use the equations in the coupled and uncoupled cases. Our results show that the coupling between neck and radial motions reduces the neck growth velocity and delays the transition from dinuclear to mononuclear regimes. In addition, by solving these dynamic equations we get the probability distributions of radial degree of freedom at the injection point s(in) in the asymmetric fission valley. In this way, s(in) is no longer an adjustable parameter in the fusion-by-diffusion model. The distributions obtained are located at positions very close to s = 0. Moreover, the coupling significantly reduces the fluctuation in the s(in) space. Our results show that the quasifissionlike events are unlikely to take place during the transition period for the mass asymmetric systems. Based on the s(in) distribution obtained, the evaporation residue ( ER) cross sections for 3n and 4n evaporation channels in the Ti-50 + Cf-249 reaction leading to formation of (296)120 and (295)120 isotopes are calculated. The maximum ER cross sections in 3n and 4n channels with the s(in) distributions are equal to 0.1 and 0.065 pb, respectively, which are more than two times larger than those obtained by the fusion-by-diffusion model with the s(in) = 0 assumption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据