4.5 Article

208Pb-daughter cluster radioactivity and the deformations and orientations of nuclei

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 79, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.064616

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India
  2. University Grant Commission (UGC), New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of deformations and orientations of nuclei is studied for the first time in cluster decays of various radioactive nuclei, particularly those decaying to doubly closed shell, spherical Pb-208 daughter nucleus. Also, the significance of using the correct Q-value of the decay process is pointed out. The model used is the preformed cluster model (PCM) of Gupta and collaborators [R. K. Gupta , Proc. Int. Conf. on Nuclear Reactions Mechanisms, Varenna, 1988, p. 416; Phys. Rev. C 39, 1992 (1989); 55, 218 (1997); Heavy Elements and Related New Phenomena, edited by W. Greiner and R. K. Gupta, World Sc. 1999, Vol. II, p. 731]. In this model, cluster emission is treated as a tunneling of the confining interaction barrier by a cluster considered already preformed with a relative probability P-0. Since both the scattering potential and potential energy surface due to the fragmentation process in the ground state of the parent nucleus change significantly with the inclusion of deformation and orientation effects, both the penetrability P and preformation probability P-0 of clusters change accordingly. The calculated decay half-lives for all the cluster decays investigated here are generally in good agreement with measured values for the calculation performed with quadrupole deformations beta(2) alone and optimum orientations of cold elongated configurations. In some cases, particularly for C-14 decay of Ra nuclei, the inclusion of multipole deformations up to hexadecapole beta(4) is found to be essential for a comparison with data. However, the available beta(4)-values, particularly for nuclei in the mass region 16 <= A <= 26, need be used with caution. .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据