4.5 Article

Neutron star properties in density-dependent relativistic Hartree-Fock theory

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 78, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.78.065805

关键词

-

资金

  1. Major State Basic Research Development Program [2007CB815000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10435010, 10775004, 10221003]
  3. Asia-Europe Link Program in Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics [CN/ASIA-LINK/008094-791]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the equations of state provided by the newly developed density-dependent relativistic Hartree-Fock (DDRHF) theory for hadronic matter, the properties of the static and beta-equilibrium neutron stars without hyperons are studied for the first time and compared to the predictions of the relativistic mean-field models and recent observational data. The influences of Fock terms on properties of asymmetric nuclear matter at high densities are discussed in detail. Because of the significant contributions from the sigma- and omega-exchange terms to the symmetry energy, large proton fractions in neutron stars are predicted by the DDRHF calculations, which strongly affect the cooling process of the star. A critical mass of about 1.45M(circle dot), close to the limit of 1.5M(circle dot) determined by modern soft X-ray data analysis, is obtained by DDRHF with the effective interactions PKO2 and PKO3 for the occurrence of the direct Urca process in neutron stars. The maximum masses of neutron stars given by the DDRHF calculations lie between 2.45M(circle dot) and 2.49M(circle dot), which are in reasonable agreement with the high pulsar mass of (2.08 +/- 0.19)M-circle dot from PSR B1516 + 02B. It is also found that the mass-radius relations of neutron stars determined by DDRHF are consistent with the observational data from thermal radiation measurements in the isolated neutron star RX J1856, quasiperiodic brightness oscillations in the low-mass X-ray binaries 4U 0614 + 09 and 4U 1636-536, and the redshift determined in the low-mass X-ray binary EXO 0748-676.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据