4.6 Article

Self-consistent determination of Hubbard U for explaining the anomalous magnetism of the Gd13 cluster

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 89, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.085103

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-FG02-96ER45579]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-11274146]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB933101]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2022013zrct01]
  5. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effective on-site Coulomb interaction (Hubbard U) is an important parameter for studying strongly correlated systems. While U is determined empirically by fitting to bulk values, its value for a cluster with a finite number of atoms remains uncertain. Here, we choose Gd-13 as a prototypical example of a strongly correlated cluster. Contrary to the well-known results in transition-metal clusters where magnetic moments of clusters are larger than their bulk, in Gd-13 cluster the magnetic moment is smaller than its bulk value. Using density functional theory and the linear response approach, we determine U self-consistently for the cluster and apply it to explain the anomalous magnetic properties of Gd-13. We demonstrate that the interaction between core and shell atoms of the Gd-13 cluster strongly depends on the Hubbard U. For U = 0 eV magnetism is governed by a direct f-f electron interaction between core and shell atoms, while for U = 5.5 eV it is the indirect Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida interaction that prevails. We also demonstrate that the noncollinear spin arrangement of each atom in the cluster strongly depends on the Hubbard U. Monte Carlo calculations further confirm that magnetic moments decrease with temperature, thus addressing a long-standing disagreement in experimental results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据