4.6 Article

Sudden reversal in the pressure dependence of Tc in the iron-based superconductor CsFe2As2: A possible link between inelastic scattering and pairing symmetry

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 89, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.134502

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  2. Canada Research Chair
  3. NSERC
  4. FRQNT
  5. CFI
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11190021]
  7. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  8. National Basic Research Program of China
  9. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation
  10. Canada Research Chair program
  11. National Research Council Canada
  12. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  13. Government of Saskatchewan
  14. Western Economic Diversification Canada
  15. University of Saskatchewan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a sudden reversal in the pressure dependence of T-c in the iron-based superconductor CsFe2As2, similar to that discovered recently in KFe2As2 [Tafti et al., Nat. Phys. 9, 349 (2013)]. As in KFe2As2, we observe no change in the Hall coefficient at T -> 0, again ruling out a Lifshitz transition across the critical pressure P-c. We interpret the T-c reversal in the two materials as a phase transition from one pairing state to another, tuned by pressure, and we investigate which parameters control this transition. Comparing samples of different residual resistivity rho(0), we find that a sixfold increase in impurity scattering does not shift P-c. From a study of x-ray diffraction on KFe2As2 under pressure, we report the pressure dependence of lattice constants and As-Fe-As bond angle. The pressure dependence of the various lattice parameters suggests that P-c should be significantly higher in CsFe2As2 than in KFe2As2, but we find on the contrary that P-c is lower in CsFe2As2, indicating that other factors control T-c. Resistivity measurements under pressure reveal a change of regime across P-c, suggesting a possible link between inelastic scattering and pairing symmetry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据