4.6 Article

Electronic states in finite graphene nanoribbons: Effect of charging and defects

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 88, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.075429

关键词

-

资金

  1. Vaisala foundation
  2. Finnish Doctoral Programme in Computational Sciences FICS
  3. Academy of Finland through its Centres of Excellence Program [251748, 250280]
  4. NWO (Chemical Sciences, Veni-grant) [722.011.007]
  5. European Research Council [ERC-2011-StG 278698-PRECISE-NANO]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the electronic structure of finite armchair graphene nanoribbons using density-functional theory and the Hubbard model, concentrating on the states localized at the zigzag termini. We show that the energy gaps between end-localized states are sensitive to doping, and that in doped systems, the gap between the end-localized states decreases exponentially as a function of the ribbon length. Doping also quenches the antiferromagnetic coupling between the end-localized states leading to a spin-split gap in neutral ribbons. By comparing dI/dV maps calculated using the many-body Hubbard model, its mean-field approximation and density-functional theory, we show that the use of a single-particle description is justified for graphene pi states in case spin properties are not the main interest. Furthermore, we study the effect of structural defects in the ribbons on their electronic structure. Defects at one ribbon terminus do not significantly modify the electronic states localized at the intact end. This provides further evidence for the interpretation of a multipeak structure in a recent scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) experiment resulting from inelastic tunneling processes [van der Lit et al., Nat. Commun. 4, 2023 (2013)]. Finally, we show that the hydrogen termination at the flake edges leaves identifiable fingerprints on the positive bias side of STS measurements, thus possibly aiding the experimental identification of graphene structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据