4.6 Article

Field-angle-resolved anisotropy in superconducting CeCoIn5 using realistic Fermi surfaces

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 87, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.174514

关键词

-

资金

  1. US DOE through the LDRD [DE-AC52-06NA25396]
  2. Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES), Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering
  3. NSF [DMR-1105339, DMR 0954342]
  4. US DOE through BES [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Materials Research [1105339] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Materials Research
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0954342] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compute the field-angle-resolved specific heat and thermal conductivity using realistic model band structures for the heavy-fermion superconductor CeCoIn5 to identify the gap structure and location of nodes. We use a two-band tight-binding parametrization of the band dispersion as input for the self-consistent calculations in the quasiclassical formulation of the superconductivity. Systematic analysis shows that modest in-plane anisotropy in the density of states and Fermi velocity in tetragonal crystals significantly affects the fourfold oscillations in thermal quantities, when the magnetic field is rotated in the basal plane. The Fermi-surface anisotropy substantially shifts the location of the lines in the H-T plane, where the oscillations change sign compared to quasicylindrical model calculations. In particular, at high fields, the anisotropy and sign reversal are found even for isotropic gaps. Our findings imply that a simultaneous analysis of the specific heat and thermal conductivity, with an emphasis on the low-energy sector, is needed to restrict potential pairing scenarios in multiband superconductors. We discuss the impact of our results on recent measurements of the Ce-115 family, namely, CeT In-5 with T = Co, Rh, Ir.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据