4.6 Article

Two-step charge photogeneration dynamics in polymer/fullerene blends for photovoltaic applications

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 85, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.205206

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE at the University of Utah [DE-FG02-04ER46109]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-04ER46109] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We measured the picoseconds (ps) transient dynamics of photoexcitations in blends of poly(3-hexyl-thiophene) (P3HT; donors-D) and fullerene [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM; acceptor-A), using the transient pump/probe photomodulation technique in an unprecedented broad spectral range from 0.25 to 2.5 eV, and compared the results with organic solar cell performance based on the same blends. In D-A blends with maximum domain separation such as regio-regular P3HT/PCBM with (1.2:1) weight ratio having solar cell power conversion efficiency of similar to 4%, we found that, although the photogenerated intrachain excitons in the polymer nano-domains decay within similar to 10 ps, no charge polarons are generated on their expense up to similar to 2 ns. Instead, there is a buildup of charge transfer (CT) excitons at the D-A interfaces having the same kinetics as the exciton decay, which dissociate into separate polarons in the D and A domains at a much later time (>> 1 ns). This two-step charge photogeneration process may be typical in organic bulk heterojunction cells. Although the CT excitons are photogenerated on the exciton expense much faster in D-A blends having smaller domain size such as in regio-random P3HT/PCBM, their dissociation is less efficient because of larger binding energy. This explains the poor solar cell power conversion efficiency (<0.1%) based on this blend. Our results support the two-step charge photogeneration mechanism in polymer/fullerene blends and emphasize the important role of the CT binding energy in generating free charge polarons in organic solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据