4.6 Article

Optical dielectric function of gold

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 86, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.235147

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF CAREER Grants) [CHE0748226, ECCS-1204993]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Chemistry [1060164] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1204993] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  7. Directorate For Engineering [1067681] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In metal optics gold assumes a special status because of its practical importance in optoelectronic and nano-optical devices, and its role as a model system for the study of the elementary electronic excitations that underlie the interaction of electromagnetic fields with metals. However, largely inconsistent values for the frequency dependence of the dielectric function describing the optical response of gold are found in the literature. We performed precise spectroscopic ellipsometry measurements on evaporated gold, template-stripped gold, and single-crystal gold to determine the optical dielectric function across a broad spectral range from 300 nm to 25 mu m (0.05-4.14 eV) with high spectral resolution. We fit the data to the Drude free-electron model, with an electron relaxation time tau(D) = 14 +/- 3 fs and plasma energy h omega(p) = 8.45 eV. We find that the variation in dielectric functions for the different types of samples is small compared to the range of values reported in the literature. Our values, however, are comparable to the aggregate mean of the collection of previous measurements from over the past six decades. This suggests that although some variation can be attributed to surface morphology, the past measurements using different approaches seem to have been plagued more by systematic errors than previously assumed. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.235147

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据