4.6 Article

Van der Waals density functionals applied to solids

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 83, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.195131

关键词

-

资金

  1. EURYI award
  2. EPSRC [EP/F067496]
  3. European Research Council
  4. Royal Society
  5. UCL
  6. Office of Science and Technology through EPSRC
  7. EPSRC [EP/F067496/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F067496/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The van der Waals density functional (vdW-DF) of M. Dion et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 246401 (2004)] is a promising approach for including dispersion in approximate density functional theory exchange-correlation functionals. Indeed, an improved description of systems held by dispersion forces has been demonstrated in the literature. However, despite many applications, standard general tests on a broad range of materials including traditional hard matter such asmetals, ionic compounds, and insulators are lacking. Such tests are important not least because many of the applications of the vdW-DF method focus on the adsorption of atoms and molecules on the surfaces of solids. Here we calculate the lattice constants, bulk moduli, and atomization energies for a range of solids using the original vdW-DF and several of its offspring. We find that the original vdW-DF overestimates lattice constants in a similar manner to how it overestimates binding distances for gas-phase dimers. However, some of the modified vdW functionals lead to average errors which are similar to those of PBE or better. Likewise, atomization energies that are slightly better than from PBE are obtained from the modified vdW-DFs. Although the tests reported here are for hard solids, not normally materials for which dispersion forces are thought to be important, we find a systematic improvement in cohesive properties for the alkali metals and alkali halides when nonlocal correlations are accounted for.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据