4.6 Article

Trends in electrical transport of p-type skutterudites RFe4Sb12 (R = Na, K, Ca, Sr, Ba, La, Ce, Pr, Yb) from first-principles calculations and Boltzmann transport theory

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 84, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.235205

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB607500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11004210, 50825205, 51028201, 50821004]
  3. Science Foundation for Youth Scholar of State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructures [SKL201004]
  4. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, S3TEC Energy Frontier Research Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a consistent set of ab initio calculations of the electronic structures and electrical transport properties of p-type thermoelectric compounds RFe4Sb12, where R is a rattling filler selected from alkali metals (Na, K), alkaline earths (Ca, Sr, Ba), and rare earth metals (La, Ce, Pr, Yb). Different from the single Sb-dominated light band in the valence band edge of CoSb3, the heavy bands from Fe d electronic states also fall in the energy range close to the valence band edges in the RFe4Sb12. These heavy bands dominate the band-edge density of states, pin the Fermi levels, and mostly determine the electrical transport properties of those p-type RFe4Sb12. The Seebeck coefficients can be roughly categorized into three groups based on the charge states of fillers, and the maxima are lower than those of n-type CoSb3 skutterudites. Effective carrier relaxation time in p-type RFe4Sb12, obtained from the combinations of calculations and experiments, is remarkably similar among different compounds with values around 7.5 x 10 (15) s and weak temperature dependence. The optimal doping levels of those RFe4Sb12 are estimated to be around 0.6-0.8 holes per unit cell at 850 K, which is difficult to achieve in RFe4Sb12 compounds. Prospects for further improving the performance of p-type skutterudites are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据