4.6 Article

Reciprocal carrier collection in organic photovoltaics

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 84, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.045315

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, through the Center for Energy Nanoscience at the University of Southern California [DE-SC0001013]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, through the Center for Solar and Thermal Energy Conversion in Complex Materials at the University of Michigan [DE-SC0000957]
  3. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, through Center for Advanced Molecular Photovoltaics [KUS-C1-015-21]
  4. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
  5. Ministry of Knowledge and Economy of Korea
  6. Dankook University
  7. University of Michigan
  8. Global Photonic Energy Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Buffer layers between the acceptor and cathode can perform several functions in organic photovoltaic devices, such as providing exciton blocking, protection of active layers against damage from cathode deposition, and optical spacing to maximize the electric field in the active device region. Here, we study electron collection by replacing the common buffer layer, bathocuproine, with a series of six, substituted tris(beta-diketonato)Ru(III) analogues in the structure: indium-tin-oxide/copper phthalocyanine/C-60/buffer/Ag. These buffer layers enable collection of photogenerated electrons by transporting holes from the cathode to the C-60/buffer interface, followed by recombination with photogenerated electrons in the acceptor. We use a model for free-polaron and polaron-pair dynamics to describe device operation and the observed inflection in the current-voltage characteristics. The device characteristics are understood in terms of hole transfer from the highest occupied molecular orbital energy levels of several Ru-complexes to the acceptor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据