4.6 Article

Structural and dynamical properties of liquid Cu80Si20 alloy studied experimentally and by ab initio molecular dynamics simulations

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 84, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.134208

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF of China [10974029]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB933703, 2012CB934303]
  3. Ministry of Education of China [20100071110025]
  4. China Scholarship Council [2008634035]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10874160]
  6. 111 project
  7. US Department of Energy at Iowa State University [DE-AC02-07CH11358]
  8. Energy Research, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Science and Engineering Division
  9. National Energy Research Supercomputing Center (NERSC) at Berkeley
  10. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The local structures and dynamical properties of the liquid Cu80Si20 alloy have been studied by x-ray diffraction and ab initio molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The pair-correlation functions and the structure factors derived from the three-dimensional coordinates of the MD configurations agree well with the experimental results. The local structure of the liquids is analyzed using Honeycutt-Andersen (HA) indices, Voronoi tessellation (VT), and an atomic cluster-alignment method. The HA indices analysis shows that the pentagonal bipyramid, a fragment of an icosahedron (ICO), plays a dominant role in the short-range order (SRO) of the Cu80Si20 liquid. The HA indices corresponding to the pentagonal bipyramid increase dramatically with decreasing temperature. VT analysis indicates that, while the liquid does exhibit a strong icosahedral SRO, fcc-like SRO is also measurable. The results from VT analysis are further confirmed using the recently developed atomic cluster-alignment method. Finally, self-diffusion constants, as a function of temperature for both Cu and Si species, are calculated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据