4.6 Article

Wurtzite-derived polytypes of kesterite and stannite quaternary chalcogenide semiconductors

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 82, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.195203

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences Foundation (NSF) of China [10934002, 1095011032, 60990312, 10950110324]
  2. Research Program of Shanghai municipality
  3. Special Funds for Major State Basic Research
  4. NSF of Shanghai [10ZR1408800]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  6. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC36-08GO28308]
  7. MOE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The I-2-II-IV-VI4 quaternary chalcogenide semiconductors (e.g., Cu2ZnGeS4, Cu2ZnSnS4, Cu2ZnGeSe4 Cu2CdSnSe4, and Ag2CdGeSe4) have been studied for more than 40 years but the nature of their crystal structures has proved contentious. Literature reports exist for the stannite and kesterite mineral structures, which are zinc-blende-derived structures, and wurtzite-stannite, which is a wurtzite-derived structure. In this paper, through a global search based on the valence octet rule (local charge neutrality), we report a wurtzite-derived structure corresponding to the kesterite structure, namely, wurtzite-kesterite (space group Pc), which is the ground state for some I-2-II-IV-VI4 compounds, but is easily confused with the wurtzite-stannite space group Pmn2(1)) structure. We show that there is a clear relationship between the properties of the wurtzite-kesterite and zinc-blende-derived kesterite structures, as well as between wurtzite-stannite and stannite. Contributions from the strain and Coulomb energies are found to play an important role in determining the structural stability. The underlying trends can be explained according to the size and ionicity of the group-I, -II, -IV, and -VI atoms. Electronic-structure calculations show that the wurtzite-derived structures have properties similar to the zinc-blende-derived structures, but their band gaps are relatively larger, which has also been observed for binary II-VI semiconductors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据