4.6 Article

Charge-density wave and superconductor competition in stripe phases of high-temperature superconductors

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 82, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.144531

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR 0758462, DMR 0906521]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Materials Sciences through the Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory of the University of Illinois [DE-FG02-07ER46453]
  3. Division Of Materials Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0758462] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We discuss the problem of competition between a superconducting (SC) ordered state and a charge-density wave (CDW) state in stripe phases of high T-c superconductors. We consider an effective model for each stripe motivated by studies of spin-gapped electronic ladder systems. We analyze the problem of dimensional crossover arising from interstripe SC and CDW couplings using non-Abelian bosonization and renormalization group (RG) arguments to derive an effective O(4)-symmetric nonlinear sigma model in D = 2+ 1 for the case when both interstripe couplings are of equal magnitude as well as equally RG relevant. By studying the effects of various symmetry lowering perturbations, we determine the structure of the phase diagram and show that, in general, it has a broad regime in which both orders coexist. The quantum and thermal critical behavior is discussed in detail, and the phase coexistence region is found to end at associated T = 0 as well as T > 0 tetracritical points. The possible role of hedgehog topological excitations of the theory is considered and argued to be RG irrelevant at the spatially anisotropic higher dimensional low-energy fixed point theory. Our results are also relevant to the case of competing Neel and valence bond solid orders in quantum magnets on two-dimensional isotropic square as well as rectangular lattices interacting via nearest-neighbor Heisenberg exchange interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据