4.6 Article

Divacancy-nitrogen-assisted transition metal dispersion and hydrogen adsorption in defective graphene: A first-principles study

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 81, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.085441

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE/OS/BES and DOE/EERE [DE-AC36-08GO28308]
  2. WCU program [R31-2008-000-10059-0]
  3. Hydrogen Energy RD Center
  4. MEST
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea
  6. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [R31-2008-000-10071-0]
  7. Ministry of Education, Science & Technology (MoST), Republic of Korea [R31-2008-000-10059-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  8. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea [KINC01] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  9. National Research Foundation of Korea [23-2009-09-002-00] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a route to dispersing hydrogen-adsorbing transition metals (TMs) on a large scale onto vacancy-engineered defective graphenes by employing natural carbon-nitrogen-TM complexes, i.e., TM-containing porphyrins. Based on first-principles density-functional calculations, the TM-porphyrin core-made of one central TM and four surrounding nitrogen atoms-can be effectively generated by three defect-engineering processes of graphenes: (1) creation of carbon divacancies, (2) nitrogen substitution of unsaturated carbons, and (3) TM incorporation. The atomistically dispersed Sc, Ti, and V are able to adsorb hydrogen molecules as strongly as 0.2-0.4 eV with the Kubas coordination. The Fe-porphyrin-like unit in graphenes can also have the Kubas adsorption of hydrogen, if the exchange splitting is reduced by a compressive in-plane strain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据