4.6 Article

Influence of electron-boundary scattering on thermoreflectance calculations after intra- and interband transitions induced by short-pulsed laser absorption

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 81, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.035413

关键词

-

资金

  1. LDRD program office through Sandia National Laboratories
  2. United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC04-94AL85000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrashort pulsed lasers are effective tools for use in a wide array of nanoscale applications, ranging from precise machining of nanomaterials, to deposition of nanocomposites, to diagnostics for observations of transport properties on atomistic time and length scales. One critical caveat of these applications is predicting and controlling the temperature of the materials after the absorbed laser pulse. At relatively low absorbed laser powers, the temperature can be determined from the reflected energy from the laser pulse off the sample surface as the reflectivity and the temperature change are linearly related. However, as laser pulses become more powerful, thereby inducing large temperature changes, and as materials continue to decrease in characteristic lengths, thereby causing substrate interference affecting the absorbed energy, the determination of the temperature from reflectance becomes more complicated than the traditionally assumed linear relation. In this work, a reflectance model is developed that accounts for large temperature fluctuations in thin-film metals by utilizing the temperature dependencies of the intraband (free electron) and interband (bound electron) dielectric functions and multiple reflection theory. Electron-electron, electron-phonon, and electron-substrate scattering are exploited and the change in reflectance as a function of these various scattering events is studied in the case of both intra-and interband excitations. This thermoreflectance model is compared to thermoreflectance data on thin Au films.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据