4.6 Article

Neutron scattering study of the interplay between structure and magnetism in Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 79, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.144523

关键词

arsenic alloys; barium alloys; cobalt alloys; doping; electrical resistivity; iron alloys; magnetic transitions; neutron diffraction; phase diagrams; solid-state phase transformations; specific heat; superconducting materials

资金

  1. UK-EPSRC
  2. Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C511778/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-crystal neutron diffraction is used to investigate the magnetic and structural phase diagrams of the electron-doped superconductor Ba(Fe1-xCox)(2)As-2. Heat-capacity and resistivity measurements have demonstrated that Co doping this system splits the combined antiferromagnetic and structural transition present in BaFe2As2 into two distinct transitions. For x=0.025, we find that the upper transition is between the high-temperature tetragonal and low-temperature orthorhombic structures with (T-TO=99 +/- 0.5 K) and the antiferromagnetic transition occurs at T-AF=93 +/- 0.5 K. We find that doping rapidly suppresses the antiferromagnetism, with antiferromagnetic order disappearing at x approximate to 0.055. However, there is a region of coexistence of antiferromagnetism and signatures of superconductivity obtained from thermodynamic and transport properties. For all the compositions studied, we find two anomalies in the temperature dependence of the structural Bragg peaks from both neutron scattering and x-ray diffraction at the same temperatures where anomalies in the heat capacity and resistivity have been previously identified. Thus for x=0.025, where we have shown that the lower anomaly occurs at T-AF, we infer that there is strong coupling between the antiferromagnetism and the crystal lattice which may persist to larger x.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据