4.5 Article

Immunization of pregnant women against pertussis: The effect of timing on antibody avidity

期刊

VACCINE
卷 33, 期 16, 页码 1948-1952

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.02.059

关键词

Immunoglobulin G; Pertussis toxin; Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis maternal immunization; Pertussis; Relative avidity index

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend tetanus-diphteria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) immunization during pregnancy, preferably at 27-36 weeks gestation. Aims: First, to assess the relative avidity index (RAI) of umbilical cord immunoglobulin G (IgG) to pertussis toxin (PT) for newborns of women immunized with Tdap during late pregnancy as compared to unimmunized women. Second, to assess whether there is a preferential period of gestational Tdap immunization that provides the highest RAI of umbilical cord IgG to PT. Methods: RAI of IgG to PT was assessed via an adapted ELISA using NH4SCN as a dissociating agent. Results: We found that newborns of women immunized with Tdap during late pregnancy (n=52) had higher mean RAI of umbilical cord IgG to PT than those of unimmunized women (n=8), 73.77%+/- 12.08 (95% CI, 70.41-77.13) vs. 50.23%+/- 21.32 (95% CI, 32.41-68.06), p < 0.001. Further, the RAI of umbilical cord IgG to PT was significantly higher in newborns of women immunized at 27-30(+6) weeks gestation (n=20) when compared with newborns of women immunized at 31-36 weeks (n=22) and >36 weeks (n=7), 79.53%+/- 5.61 (95% CI, 76.91-82.16) vs. 71.56%+/- 12.58 (95% CI, 65.98-77.14) vs. 63.93%+/- 17.98 (95% CI, 47.31-80.56), p < 0.03. Conclusion: Gestational Tdap immunization between 27 and 30(+6) weeks resulted in the highest avidity of IgG to PT conveyed at delivery as compared with immunization beyond 31 weeks gestation. Future studies should be conducted to confirm our findings to optimize pertussis-controlling strategies. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据